Metadata
Title
II (7) (E) (3). Effective Consent
Category
general
UUID
8d1821568faa4e198398086f6a21f046
Source URL
https://handbook.mit.edu/ii-7-e-3-effective-consent/
Parent URL
https://idhr.mit.edu/data-dashboard/
Crawl Time
2026-03-09T03:25:22+00:00
Rendered Raw Markdown

II (7) (E) (3). Effective Consent

Source: https://handbook.mit.edu/ii-7-e-3-effective-consent/ Parent: https://idhr.mit.edu/data-dashboard/


II (7) (E) (3). Effective Consent

E (3). Effective Consent

MIT students who engage in sexual behavior of any kind are expected to do so only with the effective consent of all parties involved. Doing otherwise constitutes sexual misconduct and is a violation of this policy.

Consent is ultimately about respecting another’s autonomy to make choices about their own body, their own boundaries, and their own behavior. The fundamental purpose of the Institute’s sexual misconduct policy is to reinforce the expectation that individuals give and receive this respect in their sexual interactions.

Given the importance of sexual autonomy and the potential impact on those subjected to nonconsensual sexual activity, the Institute places the responsibility for obtaining effective consent on the person who initiates the sexual activity. That responsibility is significant.

The Institute recognizes that there are a wide variety of sexual interactions, that there is no single way to communicate consent, and that context matters. At all times, each party is free to choose where, when, and how they participate in sexual activity. Accordingly, when evaluating whether sexual activity was consensual, the Institute will consider the entirety of the sexual interaction and the relevant circumstances.

Effective Consent is:

• informed;

• freely and voluntarily given;

• mutually understandable words or actions which indicate willing participation in mutually agreed upon sexual activity.

Further:

By definition, effective consent cannot be obtained by

Effective consent cannot be obtained from someone who is incapable of giving consent for any reason, including when:

An individual violates this policy if the individual initiates and engages in sexual activity with someone who is incapacitated, and (1) the individual knew the other person was incapacitated, or (2) a sober reasonable person under similar circumstances as the person initiating the sexual activity would have known the other person was incapacitated.

For purposes of this policy, silence and passivity do notsignal consent.

There is no requirement that a person express non-consent or that they resist a sexual advance or request. For example, someone might not consent to sexual activity even though they do not say “no” or physically resist in any way. Physical or verbal resistance is evidence that there was not effective consent.

Some behaviors and statements do not indicate consent, including the following:

​A factor that may be considered when evaluating consent is whether, under similar circumstances as the person initiating the sexual activity, a sober reasonable person would have concluded that there was effective consent.

It is important for those who initiate sexual activity to understand that:

Effective consent is clearest when obtained through direct communication about the decision to engage in specific sexual activity. Effective consent need not be verbal, but verbal communication is the most reliable and effective way to seek, assess, and obtain consent. Nonverbal communication can be ambiguous. For example, heavy breathing or moaning can be a sign of arousal, but it can also be a sign of distress. Talking with sexual partners about desires, intentions, boundaries, and limits can be uncomfortable, but it serves as a strong foundation for respectful, healthy, positive, and safe intimate relationships.

II (7) (E) (2). Nonconsensual Sexual Contact

II (7) (E) (4). Incapacitation