Metadata
Title
Active Learning
Category
general
UUID
e71c76fee8c84a1d9162b1cd0ef04aeb
Source URL
https://bokcenter.harvard.edu/active-learning
Parent URL
https://bokcenter.harvard.edu/
Crawl Time
2026-03-23T03:15:38+00:00
Rendered Raw Markdown

Active Learning

Source: https://bokcenter.harvard.edu/active-learning Parent: https://bokcenter.harvard.edu/

When students are active participants during class, they are far more likely to retain and apply what they learn. When students work in pairs or small groups, pose questions, and share diverse perspectives, active learning also helps deepen knowledge and build peer relationships that might not have formed outside the course context. Structured group activities can also create more frequent and transparent opportunities to assess and grade in-class participation, giving instructors clearer insight into student understanding.

As David Gooblar says in The Missing Course,shift your planning from: “What am I going to cover today?” to “What are the students going to do today?

Getting Started:

Interactive in-class activities can be incorporated into any course format to ensure that students are engaged in their learning, understanding the material, and retaining new information. Here are a few strategies instructors can easily implement into any kind of class:

We recommend experimenting with a wide variety of exercises to keep a dynamic classroom. Additional strategies can be found on the Interactive In-Class Activities page. 

Next Steps:

Beyond single activities, below are some opportunities for making entire class meetings or even entire courses active:

For More Information:

Many of the larger scale studies on active learning have been conducted in STEM disciplines, although it is reasonable to expect that the benefits of active learning extend to any field.  A 2014 meta-analysis of 225 research studies in STEM classes found that students in classes with active learning performed 6% better on exams than students in classes with traditional lecturing, and that students in classes with traditional lecturing were 1.5 times more likely to fail than in classes with active learning (Freeman et al, 2014).  Additionally, active learning has been shown to decrease the achievement gap for underrepresented minorities and first generation college students (Theobald et al, 2020). In a study conducted at Harvard, Deslauriers et al. (2019) show that active learning leads to significantly greater course performance than high-quality traditional lectures, even when students perceive they are learning less.

For more information...

Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-based Principles for Smart Teaching. Chicago, IL: John Wiley & Sons.

Bain, K. 2004. What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (2012). Discussion As a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms. Chicago, IL: John Wiley & Sons.

Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (2016). The Discussion Book: 50 Great Ways to Get People Talking. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Brown, P. C., Roediger, H. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning, 1st Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C. 2007. Scientific teaching. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Lang, J. (2010). On Course: A Week-by-Week Guide to Your First Semester of College Teaching, 1st Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lang, J. (2016). Small Teaching: Everyday Lessons from the Science of Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Millis, B. J. 1990. Helping faculty build learning communities through cooperative groups. Available:http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/podimproveacad/202/ [2017, August 31].