Research assessments
Source: https://www.uva.nl/en/research/research-environment/research-assessments/research-assessments.html Parent: https://www.uva.nl/en/research/research-at-the-uva/research-at-the-uva.html
Research conducted by UvA academics is regularly evaluated by external and independent experts. Research evaluations within Dutch universities, usually at the level of a research institute, are carried out using a national protocol, the Strategy Evaluation Protocol (SEP).
Strategy Evaluation Protocol 2021-2027
The Strategy Evaluation Protocol for 2021-2027 was adopted by Universiteiten van Nederland (UNL), Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen (KNAW) and Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO). This protocol sets out the agreements made by the universities concerning the review of publicly-funded research in the Netherlands.
According to SEP research evaluation is done in the context of the research unit's goals and strategy. Research units can decide for themselves which indicators they consider appropriate for evaluating their unit's research. Aspects such as Open Science, Academic Culture, HR policy, and PhD policy are also covered in the evaluation.
Evaluation of national research schools
Since 2015, the quality assurance of national research schools has been carried out by the SEP review committee on the basis of the Handreiking kwaliteitsbeoordeling onderzoeksscholen (in Dutch).
Visitation reports and board positions
The reports in which the results of the visitations are recorded and the administrative responses of the Executive Board are public. Via the references below, the most recent visitation reports, executive summaries and administrative responses can be downloaded per faculty and per research unit.
Bestuursstandpunt Economics & Business 2015-2020\ Report Economics & Business 2015-2020 - Faculty of Humanities
AIHR evaluation 2018-2023\ Position statement CvB AIHR\ LOT evaluation 2018-2023\ OSK evaluation 2018-2023 - Faculty of Medicine
Report AGEM 2017-2022\ Report AI&I 2017-2022\ Report ARD 2017-2022\ Report ACS 2017-2022\ Report AMS 2017-2022\ Report ANS 2016-2021\ Report APH 2017-2022\ Report CCA 2017-2022\ Bestuursstandpunt AMC 2011-2017\ Report AMC 2011-2017 - Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences
Position statement CvB PsyRes 2017-2022\ Position statement CvB Anthropology 2013-2018\ Report Anthropology 2013-2018\ Position Statement CvB Communication Science 2014-2019\ Report research review Communication Science 2014-2019 \ Position Statement CvB Political Science 2013-2019\ Report research review Political Science 2013-2019\ Position Statement CvB GPIO 2013-2019\ Report research review Spatial Sciences 2013-2019\ Bestuurlijk standpunt CvB onderzoeksevaluatie Sociologie 2013-2018\ Report research review Sociology 2013-2018\ Bestuursstandpunt Psychology 2011-2016\ Psychology 2017\ RICDE evaluation 2018-2023\ Position statement CvB RICDE - Faculty of Science
Position statement CvB API 2016-2021\ Position statement CvB IBED 2017-2022\ Position statement CvB HIMS 2017-2022\ Position statement CvB SILS 2017-2022\ Report API & NOVA 2017-2022\ Report HIMS 2017-2022\ Report IBED 2017-2022\ Report NATST/Institute of Physics 2017-2023\ Report SILS 2017-2023\ Final report Mathematics SEP research review 2022\ Bestuursstandpunt Informatics Institute 2015-2020\ Research Review Computer Science 2015-2020\ Position Statement CvB Kortweg- De Vries Instituut\ Position statement CvB Institute for Logic, Language and Computation 2012-2017\ Report Institute for Logic, Language and Computation 2012-2017\ Position statement CvB Chemistry Ecology and Life Sciences 2011-2016\ Report Chemistry Ecology and Life Sciences 2011-2016\ Position statement CvB Physics 2010-2016\ Report Physics 2010-2016 - Faculty of Law
Position statement CvB ARILS 2016-2021\ Report Amsterdam Research Institute for Legal Studies 2016-2021 - Faculty of Dentistry
Position Statement research evaluation ACTA 2014-2019\ ACTA research review 2014-2019