HDR Supervision Arrangements Schedule 2
Source: https://policies.rmit.edu.au/document/view.php?id=255 Parent: https://policies.rmit.edu.au/browse.php
View Document
- Current Version
- Status and Details
- Associated Information
- Historic Versions
- Future Versions
- Feedback
HDR Supervision Arrangements Schedule 2 - Potential Consequences of Unsatisfactory Supervision Performance
This is the current version of this document. You can provide feedback on this policy document by navigating to the Feedback tab.
HDR Supervision Arrangements Schedule 2 - Potential Consequences of Unsatisfactory Supervision Performance
Authority for this document is established by the HDR Supervision Arrangements Procedure.
| Unsatisfactory performance indicators | Internal Supervisors |
|---|---|
| Supervisor has failed to meet the annual professional development requirements | May have load capped, be limited to associate supervisor or deregistered |
| Supervisor has had a disproportionate number of candidates request transfer to another supervisor | |
| Supervisor has had a disproportionate number of candidate withdrawals compared to completions | |
| Candidates of the supervisor regularly cannot demonstrate satisfactory performance in the milestone reviews | |
| Candidates of the supervisor are regularly overtime in a way which demonstrates lack of effective progress monitoring | |
| Supervisor has been found in serious breach of research misconduct | May be deregistered |
| Supervisor has been found guilty of staff misconduct | May be deregistered |